Court Acquits Defendants in Gold Purchase Fraud Case

Fri 11th Apr, 2025

A recent legal proceeding in Vienna concluded with the acquittal of an entrepreneurial couple, their company GGMT, and a former official, who had been accused of defrauding approximately 21,000 unsuspecting customers through a purportedly lucrative discount model for gold purchases.

The allegations, brought forth by the Economic and Corruption Public Prosecutor's Office (WKStA), suggested that the defendants had swindled clients out of over 30 million euros. The prosecution's case relied heavily on an expert report from a financial analyst, who determined that the investment model, which involved financing discounts through gold mining efforts in South America, was fundamentally flawed and could not have been viable. The report characterized the operation as a Ponzi scheme, where access to new customer funds was essential to fulfill obligations to older clients.

However, after several days of deliberation in court, the evidence presented by the prosecution failed to hold up. With a request from the defense attorneys Klaus Ainedter and Linda Poppenwimmer, the court engaged a mining expert who concluded that the gold mine in Guyana had sufficient resources and could have been operational if not for disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and unprecedented flooding.

This assessment was not effectively countered by the WKStA, which ultimately changed its stance during closing arguments, requesting the acquittal of all defendants on the basis that the business model could have been functional without external disruptions.

Following brief deliberations, the jury agreed with the prosecution's revised position and the defense's arguments, resulting in all accused individuals being found not guilty of serious fraud. The court determined that there was no evidence of deceit towards the customers, and thus, no fraud could be established. The few clients who had joined the proceedings as claimants were directed to pursue their grievances through civil legal channels. The ruling is now final.


More Quick Read Articles »