FPÖ Criticizes Government's Influence on ORF Governance Structure

Vienna - The Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) has expressed strong disapproval regarding the recent decisions made by the governing coalition involving the Österreichischer Rundfunk (ORF), the national public service broadcaster. FPÖ officials allege that the coalition, consisting of the ÖVP (Austrian People's Party), SPÖ (Social Democratic Party), and NEOS, is undermining the independence of the ORF through politically motivated appointments.

According to FPÖ Secretary General Christian Hafenecker, the decision by the ORF's public council on June 5, 2025, to appoint members to the supervisory board was criticized as a violation of constitutional and legal standards. Hafenecker asserted that the ÖVP's nominations of prominent party members, including Aubauer and Karl, contradict existing compatibility regulations for ORF officials, thereby continuing a trend of political interference in the organization.

The FPÖ claims that this situation represents a broader pattern of disregard for the rule of law, as evidenced by the previous withdrawal of nominations for Hauer and Herz due to similar legal concerns. Hafenecker pointed out that the appointments prioritize party interests over the needs of Austrian ORF consumers, who fund the broadcaster through mandatory fees.

In his critique, Hafenecker emphasized that the appointments of Aubauer, a former member of parliament, and Karl, a former justice minister, raise significant concerns regarding their compliance with the ORF law. He argued that these actions indicate a systemic issue within the government that favors political power over public accountability.

Furthermore, Hafenecker highlighted the allocation of public council representatives as indicative of a power-sharing agreement among the coalition parties, which he referred to as a 'political arrangement' that undermines the potential for independent oversight within the ORF. This coalition, he contends, operates under a framework that does not promote transparency or accountability, and instead fosters a culture of compliance with governmental directives.

Amidst these developments, he pointed out that there were alternative candidates for the public council positions who could have contributed to a more independent and diverse supervisory board. Notably, Martin Ladstätter, who advocates for the rights of people with disabilities, was mentioned as a potential candidate who could have brought valuable perspectives to the ORF. The decision to overlook such candidates in favor of party loyalists, Hafenecker argued, is a clear indication of the coalition's intent to maintain control over the ORF.

Ultimately, Hafenecker's comments reflect a growing concern regarding the implications of political interference in public broadcasting and the potential erosion of journalistic independence in Austria. The FPÖ urges the governing coalition to reconsider its approach and prioritize the integrity and independence of the ORF to ensure it serves the public interest effectively.